Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service


· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:0902.0185)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (1) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Limits to the energy resolution of a single air Cherenkov telescope at low energies
Authors:
Sobczyńska, Dorota
Affiliation:
AA(Department of Astrophysics, University of Łódź, Pomorska 149/153, 90-236 Łódź, Poland )
Publication:
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp. 045201 (2009).
Publication Date:
04/2009
Origin:
IOP
DOI:
10.1088/0954-3899/36/4/045201
Bibliographic Code:
2009JPhG...36d5201S

Abstract

The photon density on the ground is a fundamental quantity in all experiments based on Cherenkov light measurements, e.g., in imaging air Cherenkov telescopes (IACT). IACTs are commonly and successfully used in order to search and study very high energy (VHE) γ-ray sources. Difficulties with separating primary photons from primary hadrons (mostly protons) in Cherenkov experiments become larger at lower energies. I have calculated longitudinal and lateral density distributions and their fluctuations at low energies based on Monte Carlo simulations (for vertical γ cascades and protonic showers) to check the influence of the detector's parameters on the possible measurement. Relative density fluctuations are significantly higher in proton- than in photon-induced showers. Taking into account the limited detector's field of view (FOV) implies the changes of these calculated distributions for both types of primary particles and causes an enlargement in relative fluctuations. Absorption due to Rayleigh and Mie scattering has an impact on mean values but it does not change relative fluctuations. The total number of Cherenkov photons is more sensitive to the observation height in γ cascades than in proton showers at low primary energies. The relative fluctuations of the density do not depend on the reflector's size in the investigated size range (from 240 m2 up to 960 m2). This implies that a single telescope with a mirror area larger than that of a MAGIC telescope cannot achieve better energy resolution than estimated and this is presented in this paper. The correlations between longitudinal and lateral distributions are much more pronounced for primary γ-ray than for primary proton showers.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

   


Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints