SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)

· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)

· Full Refereed Journal Article (PDF/Postscript)

· Full Refereed Scanned Article (GIF)

· References in the article

· Citations to the Article (4) (Citation History)

· Refereed Citations to the Article

· SIMBAD Objects (15)

· Reads History

·

· Translate This Page

Abstract

By combining 23 measurements of the secondary's velocity with 102 of the primary's and deriving a double-lined orbit, we determine the mass ratio (q=M₁/M₂) of 93 Leo to be 1.09 +/- 0.04. The same value is derived by cross-correlating high-dispersion spectra of 93 Leo B extracted from opposite nodal phases. That value of q is consonant with previous research, but its precision is considerably improved. We show that random errors arising from the cross-correlation of broad, weak features constitute a natural limit to that precision.

The derived masses of M₁= 2.2 M_solar, M₂= 2.0 M_solar for the giant and dwarf, respectively, constrain the choice of models for fitting evolutionary tracks in the (logT_eff, logL) plane. The giant is almost certainly on its first ascent of the red giant branch, and the dwarf has evolved significantly from the main sequence. The stars fit an isochrone for log(age) = 8.95, about 0.9 Gyr. Metallicity near to solar is suggested by the close correspondence between the component spectra and those of the respective solar-abundance standards.

The primary in 93 Leo displays a marked level of chromospheric activity. By combining our high-dispersion spectra we are able to isolate emission in the Ca II K line. The chromospheric material has a small infall velocity, giving rise to a disc-averaged redshift of about 4 km s^-1, and an unchanging velocity profile which can be attributed to a large number of small, active events like prominences across the surface. While we can say that there was no perceptible change in the emission strength over an interval of 4 months, we have not made systematic observations to monitor its long-term stability.

We contrast the components of 93 Leo with those of α Equ, whose analysis was the subject of Paper 11 in this series. The primary components are very similar, but the two secondary components are extremely different in nature: whereas 93 Leo B is a broad-lined, apparently normal A star, the secondary of α Equ is a sharp-lined Am star of type ~kA3hA4mA9. We question why that should be, and recommend that a greater emphasis be placed on extracting accurate stellar parameters from the components of spectroscopic binaries as a means towards a better understanding of the vagaries of stellar evolution.

93 Leo has a 9-mag visual companion which appears to be a physical member of the system and to be a single-lined spectroscopic binary with a period of the order of a century.

Printing Options