There is a mistake in Table 1 of our paper. The problem was that the columns 5 and 6 of our table 1 were disordered and did not match the information of the galaxies in the first four columns. Here it is the corrected Table 1:
# UDS_Id, RA, DEC, z, (B-V)rest, tobs(Gyr)
6165 34.431909 -5.486879 2.512 0.680 2.744
25371 34.730860 -5.292740 2.536 0.772 2.717
79102 34.147499 -4.778464 2.536 0.799 2.717
1559 34.401503 -5.534756 2.540 0.869 2.712
40812 34.176661 -5.135145 2.565 0.689 2.684
8303 34.298936 -5.463660 2.582 0.797 2.666
24756 34.730771 -5.298486 2.668 0.889 2.574
65143 34.409159 -4.910722 2.688 0.786 2.554
78891 34.591629 -4.780382 2.705 0.770 2.537
51547 34.908643 -5.035681 2.730 0.655 2.512
39991 34.731741 -5.142950 2.754 0.584 2.488
11488 34.646744 -5.431988 2.814 0.659 2.430
85772 34.385299 -4.717825 2.853 1.060 2.394
28153 34.288224 -5.262591 2.890 0.584 2.361
28841 34.147788 -5.255004 2.896 0.921 2.355
44569 34.421943 -5.100824 2.948 0.706 2.310
10585 34.799731 -5.440235 3.033 0.835 2.238
26888 34.240491 -5.276633 3.113 0.905 2.174
14598 34.689665 -5.400858 3.288 0.395 2.044
93574 34.283743 -4.638162 3.745 0.544 1.758
Author comment submitted on 28 February, 2014 by Martín López-Corredoira ( martinlc@iac.es )